Joe Lanman takes the stage for a general introduction of the topic.
Thanks to our sponsor EMC Consulting.
Our next event will be Andy Budd talking about User Experience on 12th July. August will see a summer social (some time in the 3rd week). In September we will have Michael Mahemoff talking about HTML5.
If you know of a good venue for London Web Standards – bigger one than Square Pig, please recommend it to us.
This talk is going to be about Flash vs. HTML5 alternatives for doing common things in HTML5 as opposed to using Flash.
[19:15] Jeff Van Campen takes the stage
Multiple file uploads was missing when Jeff tried to live a few weeks without using Flash and was badly missing multiple file uploads feature on some sites. WordPress is a good example where multiple file uploads is used.
Drag and drop is one of the interesting features which is also commonly used and cool feature along with file uploads.
GMail now (if you are using Chrome) allows you to drag and drop files into GMail to send them as attachments.
This stuff works in Chrome and Firefox – should work in Safari (which is a bit weird), but should work in WebKit night build.
You can attach multiple files to GMail by using shift and selecting multiple files and then clicking on ‘Open’ to attach more than one file to GMail at once.
The way FireFox handles the multiple file uploads is not terribly user friendly as it bungs everything into the file upload field.
GMail allows a drag and drop of multiple files onto the interface to do the same thing of attaching multiple files.
Jeff demonstrated a UI which enables desktop dragging of files onto the browser and the respective web page showing those files as dropped onto the target area.
It’s not really possible to drag a picture from desktop to ‘upload your files here’ area under current implementations.
There is no keyboard accessibility solution for this problem currently – Gez Lemon is doing some work on speccing something out for this.
If you are going to need multiple uploads you are probably going to need a Flash fall-back in order for this to work.
Flash is still the only way for this to work in Opera and IE.
FaceBook handles multiple file uploads through a Java applet of some sort.
The fall back solution is to offer multiple file upload boxes in straight HTML.
[19:30] Nick Smith takes the stage to talk about fonts
Ol’ skool font replacement solutions are Cufon, sIFR, image replacement under the current state of the web.
With CSS3 and @font-face we are downloading fonts from the server.
Cufon wraps words in < span > tags and the words end up being broken up by this tag.
Now Cufon uses < canvas > which is good and is moving towards future.
Cufon can embed links and can protect your fonts (sort of).
Cufon is kind of accessible.
sIFR (Scalable Inman Flash Replacement) is:
- Well developed
- Handles any font format
- Good to protect your font
- Can be resized
- Can embed links
but it is also:
- Slow to load
- Don’t handle Flash blockers
This is what Jeff pointed out – there is a group of people who are saying ‘no’ to Flash, and they are left in no-man’s land.
Nick Smith’s site still uses Flash and he demoed an example what happens on it if Flash is disabled or blocked – not very good.
@font-face & CSS3 solution has the following pros and cons:
- Supports Internet Explorer 6
- Live text
There are also following cons:
- Big licencing issues
- Free fonts can be a minefield
- FOUT (Flash of Unstyled Text)
Nick demos a font changing example from Apple Developer web site to show the power of CSS3 on the fly.
Kornel shouts from the back rows saying that this is ‘not HTML5’ – discussion starts on whether this is or is not HTML5.
Nick says he constantly has the problem with designers that certain fonts cannot be used within web pages, so he has to regularly instruct them that those fonts cannot be used within the context of web pages.
Someone (a visual designer) makes a remark from the audience that majority of CSS3 fonts don’t look as good for Windows users while sIFR and Cufon look much better and as intended by the visual designer.
Audience member says: It seems as though currently you are required to download entire font definition from the web with @font-face which seems to be massive for some languages like Chinese.
Much discussion takes place around fonts on the web and HTML5, downloading it, using it, performance issues and display issues. Many people seem to have an opinion about this particular topic and are commenting extensively about their experience and thoughts about this.
How long until we see ‘HTML5 loading screens’ like we have been seeing on Flash sites?
Does anyone know why aren’t the really big font foundries signing up to distribute their fonts through this. Kornel replies that the same thing happened with music industry. Pirating debate kicks off with a lot of comments again.
You can go to almost every font library and download individual types of fonts, but it is not cheap.
Majority of clients want to pay for the font and its use on a web site.
Kids on MySpace are likely to pirate fonts, but …
Would clients pay for image from Getty Images, so why not pay for fonts also?
[20:24] Edd Sowden about CSS transitions and live streaming
HTTP live streaming
OSMF – Open Source Media Framework can be used as one of the solutions (this is an Adobe solution)
JW Player (from v4.6) supports this feature
Demo shows a live example of video player switching on the fly from low quality content to high quality video without stopping
This works by chunking up files – Apples implementation uses tools which come with Snow Leopard, but only works in Safari under Snow Leopard OS.
ISS Smooth Streaming is Microsoft’s implementation of this live streaming solution.
Looks like its Apple vs. Flash.
On YouTube we currently have the manual process of users having to switch the video up a notch to get the better quality on their browsers.
[Audience question] Is there going to be a native streaming within the browsers implemented any time soon?
I haven’t seen anyone try it other than Apple on Safari with Snow Leopard, but this can be done in Flash.
[20:42] Joe Lanman on stage talking about Vector Graphics
Flash is used quite widely for vector graphics – for practical things like graphing.
A lot of the issues around various solutions are to do with the fact that Internet Explorer does not support it.
Raphael JS is a useful library which allows use of SVG in Internet Explorer by converting stuff to VML.
SVG is more ‘webby’ as it is within the DOM (SVG is XML based) so its pretty cool in that respect.
Joe takes us to Raphael JS web site to show us some examples of what is possible with this library.
The output of a graph in code terms is SVG code which can be styled with CSS in the same way we do it with HTML. This is theoretically more accessible as assistive technologies can read the graph.
Its a little bit weird in that it doesn’t support everything so animation via JS won’t work.
Kornel throws in a comment that SVG support animation elements, so animations can be done natively using SVG coding.
Downsides of this method?
This solution is good for graphing but not necessarily for animations which Flash is really easy to create with.
Android browser does not support SVG because ‘SVG adds 1MB to the overall download size’.
[Audience comment] This graphing library does not handle many data points very well. FireFox also tends to halt when there is a big amount of SVG data within a page.
Many audience comments about this topic once again. Flash vs. these SVG diagrams look very similar and not much different at all.
[21:03] Talk is formally finished and informal conversation starts
BBC Homepage uses canvas with Flash fall back on the homepage.
[Audience question] Does it really matter that something is HTML5 as opposed to Flash now?
The BBC clock on the homepage works on an iPhone as well.
Excellent audience discussion about why using open technologies instead of Flash is a good idea.
Joe Lanman closes the night off thanking everyone for participating.